Five forces that could propel markets during a Biden presidency

by | Nov 9, 2020

Share this article

 “While legal challenges are underway, the Associated Press on Saturday called Pennsylvania for Joe Biden, which would push him past the 270 Electoral Count threshold. While this process may feel like an eternity, Biden’s timing from a market perspective may be impeccable according to Hooper.

“Don’t get us wrong, there are challenges ahead. COVID-19 cases are rising, and the threat of economically damaging lockdowns is elevated However, history has taught us that the presidents who have experienced outsized market returns typically were inaugurated in troubled economic environments. Presidents Reagan (high and rising inflation) and Obama (global financial crisis) immediately come to mind.

“Rather than dwell on the near-term negatives, let’s instead focus on the potential tailwinds that would likely be supportive to markets in a Biden administration.” Below she highlights some tailwinds for advisers to consider:

 
 

Five potential tailwinds that could drive markets

  1. Betting against an economic recovery is betting against medicine, science and human ingenuity. Significant progress has already been made in the fight against COVID, with scientists, government agencies and private industry working together to understand the virus, create and test potential vaccines, and pre-manufacture millions of doses of the most promising candidates to enable immediate distribution when a final vaccine is ready. The timing of a vaccine is still unclear, but is likely to emerge in the early years of the next presidential term.
  2. The US Federal Reserve is poised to keep interest rates at, or near, zero for at least the first two years of Biden’s term. There is US$4.3 trillion in money market assets, up from US$3.6 trillion at the beginning of 2020, earning effectively nothing in interest.1 Among the Fed’s stated goals is to inflate away 2% of the value of that cash each year, thereby incentivizing consumers and investors to do something with that money. The adage about not fighting the Fed will likely apply over the next four years.
  3. More fiscal support is likely forthcoming. While it may not be the outsized fiscal package that the Democrats had envisioned, it will likely be large enough to provide an additional boost to the economic recovery. Paradoxically, a more modest fiscal bill may serve to extend the market and business cycles, as it would be unlikely to bring forward the inflationary pressures that presage Fed tightening and the end of cycles.
  4. Stocks are historically cheap to bonds2, and yet stocks have outperformed bonds over most time periods.3 Government-related bonds are not only overbought compared to stocks4 but may fall under pressure as interest rates rise in an economic recovery. Investors are likely to determine that in this type of environment, there few alternatives that offer the growth potential of equities.
  5. Macro conditions do not need to be “good” for markets to trend higher. Instead, they need to be getting better. The US economy and S&P 500 Index recently experienced historic collapses. Economic activity and earnings growth are likely to be outsized during the next presidential term versus the 2020 comps.

Is this a “Goldilocks” environment?

Investors often ask strategists to compare the current environment to a period in the past. 2011 to 2014 comes to mind. Those years had a Democratic president, a divided Congress, an improving economic and earnings backdrop from very depressed levels, the Fed Funds Rate at zero, and stocks cheap to bonds. Forgive us for having déjà vu. That period proved to be favorable for equities and for credit.

 
 

In fact, this could be a Goldilocks environment — not too hot to cause inflation, but not too cold, either. A Biden presidency with a Republican Senate would be unlikely to see any increase in taxes, which was arguably the biggest fear investors had about a Biden presidency. And a Biden presidency could mean a return to a more traditional, predictable approach to trade policy, which would likely result in less volatile markets.

But would it also mean stalled progress on other issues? Assuming a narrow Republican majority in the Senate, and a centrist approach by Biden, such a divided government might not mean total gridlock. In particular, Biden might be able to eke out a decent stimulus bill by forming a coalition with moderate Republican senators. While few may have expected this or wanted this outcome, it could prove to be a “best-case scenario.”

In short, Joe Biden has spent nearly half a century in politics, but his timing may yet prove impeccable.

 
 

1 Source: Investment Company Institute, as of Nov. 4, 2020

2 Source: Bloomberg, L.P., Standard & Poor’s, as of Sept. 30, 2020. As represented by the difference between the earnings yield of the S&P 500 Index and the 10-year US Treasury rate

3 Sources: Bloomberg, L.P., Standard & Poor’s, looking at 10-year time periods, rolling monthly, going back to 1957. Based on the S&P 500 Index and the Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index.

4 Sources, Bloomberg, L.P., Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

 

Share this article

Related articles

IFAM 127 | Not if, but when | April 2024

IFAM 127 | Not if, but when | April 2024

Not if, but when… Spring finally seems to have arrived! Since our last edition, we have had the Spring Budget and the Bank of England (BoE) rate announcement to name but a few important landmarks. This has kept us, like all of you I am sure, quite busy over the last...

Sign up to the IFA Magazine Newsletter

Trending articles

IFA Talk logo

IFA Talk is our flagship podcast, that fits perfectly into your busy life, bringing the latest insight, analysis, news and interviews to you, wherever you are.

IFA Talk Podcast - listen to the latest episode

x