A significant number of financial advisers believe clients would accept lower returns if their money were having a measurable social or environmental impact – and investors have endorsed this view, the Embark Investor Confidence Barometer has revealed.
Although sustainable investing is expected to produce sustainable returns over the long-term, this finding challenges an idea in the world of investment: that a perceived risk of lower returns is deterring some clients from making ESG investments.
The Confidence Barometer is a twice yearly survey of 1,000 people conducted by the Embark Group (Embark), a leading UK retirement solutions provider. It found that almost half (45%) of surveyed advisers– and more than half (53%) of female advisers – believe their clients would accept a lower financial return if an investment had social or environmental benefits.
This belief is backed up by investors themselves, particularly younger investors with a financial adviser. More than half (58%) of younger advised investors surveyed (35-44) indicated that they would agree† to accept a lower financial return if they felt their money was having a positive social or environmental impact. However, older investors were less inclined to do so, with only 30% of those 55 or older agreeing that they would be prepared to settle for lower returns.
Fewer non-advised investors (32%) said they would agree to accept a lower return, although younger investors were again more likely to do so.
Importance of a financial adviser
The data suggests that investors should hire a financial adviser if they want greater confidence that their money is making a difference. Advised investors are almost twice as confident as non-advised investors that their portfolio is invested in line with their ESG values.
Less than a third (32%) of surveyed non-advised investors agreed their portfolio was invested according to their values, compared to 58% of advised investors. Meanwhile, 39% of non-advised investors said they were confident‡ they knew where their money was and that it was meeting ESG principles, compared with 60% of advised investors.
Finally, young advisers (18-34) were most confident in their ability to support clients around ESG.
Lack of options
Advisers believe there is a lack of viable ESG options for them to recommend to clients. Only around half (53%) of surveyed advisers were confident they could provide clients with an adequate range of options from an ESG standpoint, with the remainder either neutral or not confident.
The financial advice industry also has work to do to truly understand clients’ ESG needs, according to the Barometer. Almost half (42%) of advisers stated they were either neutral or not confident in their ability to accurately measure clients’ ESG preferences. Similarly, nearly half (46%) were either neutral or not confident in their ability to invest according to clients’ ESG preferences.
Peter Docherty, CEO, Embark Platform, said: “It’s very possible those who are more likely to embrace ESG are also more likely to seek advice. But advisers carry significant weight in introducing investment concepts to their clients. The role of advisers to help guide clients through the complex world of ESG is invaluable.”
Commenting on these results, Greg Davies, Oxford Risk, said: “It is striking that 45% of advisers are confident their clients will accept a lower return for ESG, with the same proportion of advised clients saying the same. It should also not come as a surprise – after all most people are willing to accept returns of minus 100% on the wealth they donate to charities.
“Advisers clearly have the potential to be very effective in directing investors towards ESG investing. However, they also need help to do this with confidence. Indeed, for many advisers ESG just adds complexity and hassle to an already complex problem. For advisers to most effectively open ESG doors they need the technology and tools to be able to accurately profile investor’s ESG preferences, and crucially to connect these preferences directly into tailored ESG-suitable portfolios.”