Net pay pension problem ‘fixed’, but low earners lose millions in tax relief

by | Jul 20, 2022

Share this article

Following the publishing of the government legislation confirming that 1.2 million low earners will see a boost in take-home pay because it is tackling the net pay pension tax issue, Jon Greer, head of retirement policy at Quilter has commented.

He said: “After many years of outcry from the industry, the government finally committed to addressing the inherent inequality for low earners in pension net pay schemes versus relief at source schemes.

“Today, the government has published legislation confirming that it is still set to go ahead with the changes although there has been no shift of the time frame and the longstanding dithering has resulted in 1.2 million workers needing to wait until the 2025/26 tax year to see change. What’s more, the relief will only applied to contributions made from 2024/25, meaning low earners will have forgone millions in pensions tax relief due to years of the government sitting on their hands.

“The Conservative party manifesto recognised the problem and pledged to solve the issue all the way back in November 2019. By the time it is eventually fixed, hundreds of millions will have been lost in pension funds by 1.2m lower earners, three quarters of whom are women.

 
 

“The net-pay tax flaw means some workers earning £12,570 a year or less could retire with a pot worth thousands of pounds less than others. This is because people enter into a perverse lottery where those who are in a net-pay pension scheme don’t benefit from government tax relief into their pension pots, while other workers who are in a ‘relief at source’ scheme receive the top up.

“While it is laudable that the government is actually tackling the problem, its solution remains imperfect, but at least better than the current situation, as it commits to paying a top-up contribution directly to the person’s bank account. However, this ultimately means they will lose out on potential growth by not having the money held in the pension fund and invested.

“This solution also creates a risk of delay between the pension contribution being made and receiving the top-up. It’s been a long road to get to this point, and there are still some miles to go before this quirk in the pension tax system is finally addressed.”

 
 

Share this article

Related articles

IFAM 128 | Spring forward | May 2024

IFAM 128 | Spring forward | May 2024

Welcome to the May edition of IFA Magazine.  As usual, within it we bring you a range of insight, analysis and information from experts across the profession. It’s all intended to support you and your teams, not just in what you do but how you do it.  The considerable...

IFAM 127 | Not if, but when | April 2024

IFAM 127 | Not if, but when | April 2024

Not if, but when… Spring finally seems to have arrived! Since our last edition, we have had the Spring Budget and the Bank of England (BoE) rate announcement to name but a few important landmarks. This has kept us, like all of you I am sure, quite busy over the last...

Sign up to the IFA Magazine Newsletter

Trending articles

IFA Talk logo

IFA Talk is our flagship podcast, that fits perfectly into your busy life, bringing the latest insight, analysis, news and interviews to you, wherever you are.

IFA Talk Podcast - listen to the latest episode

x